ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Modeling the Influence of Bandwidth and Envelope on Categorical Loudness Scaling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a loudness-matching paradigm, a reduction in the loudness of sounds with bandwidths less than one-half octave compared to a tone of equal sound pressure level has been observed previously for five-tone complexes at 60 dB SPL centered at 1 kHz. Here, this loudness-reduction phenomenon is explored using band-limited noise across wide ranges of frequency and level. Additionally, these measurements are simulated by a model of loudness judgement based on neural ensemble averaging (NEA), which serves as a proxy for central auditory signal processing. Multi-frequency equal-loudness contours (ELC) were measured for each of the adult participants (N=100) with pure-tone average (PTA) thresholds that ranged from normal to moderate hearing loss using a categorical-loudness-scaling (CLS) paradigm. Presentation level and center frequency of the test stimuli were determined on each trial according to a Bayesian adaptive algorithm, which enabled multi-frequency ELC estimation within about five minutes of testing. Three separate test conditions differed by stimulus type: (1) pure-tone, (2) quarter-octave noise and (3) octave noise. For comparison, loudness judgements for all three stimulus types were also simulated by the NEA model, which comprised a nonlinear, active, time-domain cochlear model with an appended stage of neural spike generation. Mid-bandwidth loudness reduction was observed to be greatest at moderate stimulus levels and frequencies near 1 kHz. This feature was approximated by the NEA model, which suggests involvement of an early stage of the central auditory system in the formation of loudness judgements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.