ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Channel Capacity for Time-Resolved Effective Connectivity in Functional Neuroimaging.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how brain regions influence one another over time is a central goal of neuroscience. However, existing approaches to effective connectivity often involve tradeoffs among mechanistic interpretability, computational scalability, and time-resolved estimation. Here, we introduce information channel capacity, a model-based measure of directed information transfer between brain regions, and combine it with a sliding-window framework to estimate time-varying directional interactions. We validate channel capacity across multimodal neuroimaging datasets in humans and rodents because this breadth is needed to test three complementary properties that no single dataset can establish alone: sensitivity to evoked information transfer, specificity against false-positive directional effects, and the ability to capture meaningful temporal variability in directed brain-network interactions. Human motor-task fMRI tests sensitivity, showing that channel capacity detects task-related increases in directed interactions and stronger directional effects during task than during rest in motor-related regions. Concurrent rat local field potential (LFP)-fMRI tests specificity, showing minimal spurious directional asymmetry relative to scan-to-scan variability and consistent temporal dynamics across neural and BOLD signals. Mouse Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.