ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
IDBSpred: An intrinsically disordered binding site predictor using machine learning and protein language model.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) mediate many cellular functions through interactions with structured protein partners, but predicting the corresponding binding sites on the structured partner remains challenging. Here, we present IDBSpred, a sequence-based method for residue-level prediction of IDP-binding sites on structured proteins. Training and test data were collected from the DIBS database, which contains more than 700 non-redundant IDP-protein complexes. Residue-level embeddings of structured partner sequences were generated using the ESM-2 protein language model and used as input to a multilayer perceptron classifier for binary prediction of binding versus non-binding residues. Analysis of amino acid composition showed that IDP-binding sites are enriched in aromatic residues, especially Trp, Tyr, and Phe, as well as several charged and polar residues, whereas Ala and several small or conformationally restrictive residues are depleted. The classifier achieved an ROC AUC of 0.87 and an average precision of 0.61. Structural case studies further showed that the predicted sites largely recapitulate the major experimentally defined binding interfaces. These results demonstrate that protein language model embeddings plus machine learning algorithms can effectively capture sequence features associated with IDP recognition on structured proteins. IDBSpred provides a practical framework for studying IDP-mediated interfaces and identifying potential therapeutic hotspots.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.