ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Left atrial flow and thrombosis risk from 4D CT contrast dynamics by physics-informed neural network and indicator dilution theory.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) promotes blood stasis and thrombus formation, most often within the left atrial appendage (LAA), and can lead to stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Time-resolved contrast-enhanced computed tomography (4D CT) captures left atrial (LA) opacification and washout, but it does not directly provide quantitative stasis metrics such as blood residence time. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can quantify LA/LAA residence time, yet routine clinical use is limited by computational cost and sensitivity to patient-specific boundary conditions. Here, we present two complementary approaches to infer time-resolved 3D residence time fields directly from contrast dynamics. First, a physics-informed neural network (PINN) treats contrast as a passive scalar and jointly reconstructs velocity and residence time by enforcing the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations and transport equations for contrast concentration and residence time in moving, patient-specific LA anatomies. Second, an indicator dilution theory (IDT) formulation computes voxelwise, time-resolved residence time maps from contrast time curves alone by constructing a PV-referenced impulse response and modeling transport with a tank-in-series model with spatially dependent parameters. Both methods are benchmarked against patient-specific CFD in six cases spanning diverse LA function, including three patients with TIA or thrombus in the LAA and three patients free of events. Both approaches reproduce expected spatial and temporal trends, with higher residence time in the distal LAA and higher LAA residence time in cases with TIA or thrombus. IDT demonstrates the closest agreement with CFD across the full range of residence times and produces maps in seconds, facilitating clinical translation. In contrast, the PINN additionally recovers phase-dependent atrial flow structures, but tends to smooth and underestimate the highest residence-time regions and requires hours of training. Together, these results support a scalable workflow in which IDT enables rapid stasis screening from contrast CT, and PINNs provide a complementary pathway for detailed, patient-specific hemodynamic inference when full-field flow information is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.