ArticleAfrican journal of disability2026
Developing implementation strategies for the framework and strategy for disability and rehabilitation in South Africa: An approach using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change framework.
Article in African journal of disability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The expiry of South Africa's Framework and Strategy for Disability and Rehabilitation (FSDR) created an opportunity to critically assess its effectiveness, strengths and limitations to inform the development of a new disability and rehabilitation policy. Objectives: As the primary gap in the FSDR related to weak implementation rather than policy intent, this study aimed to develop evidence-informed implementation strategies. Findings from a document review, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were triangulated and guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework. Method: A descriptive qualitative design was used. Four focus group discussions were conducted with stakeholders involved in FSDR implementation to reach consensus on practical strategies to strengthen implementation. Data were analysed using combined inductive and deductive thematic approaches, and identified strategies were mapped to the ERIC framework. Results: Seven themes were identified as key determinants of implementation success or failure: limited awareness and training; resource constraints; poor interdepartmental collaboration; weak governance and policy buy-in; inadequate monitoring and evaluation systems; the need for context-specific approaches; and ongoing professional development. Stakeholders actively contributed to refining strategies within each thematic area. Conclusion: The findings highlight critical implementation gaps in training, governance, resources and collaboration. Addressing these through targeted, contextually appropriate strategies can strengthen future disability and rehabilitation policy implementation and improve service delivery in South Africa. Contribution: This study offers a roadmap for improving disability and rehabilitation policy implementation and can inform both future policy planning and clinical service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.