Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958920›Full record

ReviewBrain communications2026

Ferroptosis in microglial activation: a systematic review and multidata comparison.

Ida Pesämaa, Srinivas Koutarapu, Henrik Zetterberg, Stefanie Fruhwürth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ida PesämaaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg 413 45, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3902-3137
Srinivas KoutarapuDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg 413 45, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-4354
Stefanie FruhwürthDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg 413 45, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ferroptosis is a redox-driven and iron-dependent type of programmed cell death, with lipid peroxidation as a central and required feature of the process. During ferroptosis, cells exert strong proinflammatory effects, suggesting that ferroptosis may play a role in the regulation of inflammation and immune response. However, very few studies have investigated the process of ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation in microglia, the innate immune cells of the brain. In this review, we summarize the concept of ferroptosis and present a list of 120 ferroptosis-relevant proteins, which includes over twice as many entries as the current Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway for ferroptosis. We compare our manually compiled list with microglial activation signatures reported by us and others, revealing ferroptosis-relevant changes in models for microglial activation. Finally, we highlight a selection of ferroptosis-relevant proteins as potential biomarker candidates for ferroptosis.

Indexed as

ferroptosisinflammationmicroglianeuroinflammation

Identifiers

PMID41958920
PMCPMC13056721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.