ArticleDigital health
HEAL-AI: Enabling proactive and personalized smart healthcare through hierarchical edge autonomous learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop a proactive, personalized, and privacy-preserving smart healthcare framework that enables real-time clinical decision support across distributed healthcare environments while ensuring interpretability, low latency, and regulatory compliance. Methods: This study proposes HEAL-AI (Healthcare Empowerment via Adaptive Learning with Artificial Intelligence), a federated neuro-symbolic framework that integrates federated learning, hierarchical contextual attention, symbolic medical reasoning, and edge intelligence optimization. The system supports collaborative model training across hospitals, clinics, and wearable devices without sharing raw patient data. Privacy is enforced using secure aggregation and differential privacy mechanisms, while edge intelligence techniques such as model compression and adaptive offloading enable real-time inference on resource-constrained devices. HEAL-AI was evaluated on multiple benchmark datasets, including MIMIC-III, PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019, eICU, MIMIC-IV, and a custom HEAL-Wearable dataset. Performance was assessed using diagnostic accuracy, early-detection lead time, inference latency, energy consumption, explainability scores from clinical experts, and privacy leakage under standard attack models. Results: Across all datasets, HEAL-AI consistently outperformed state-of-the-art baselines. The framework achieved up to 17.3% improvement in diagnostic accuracy, enabled early sepsis detection by 5.9 h, and reduced inference latency and energy consumption by 32.6% on edge devices. Explainability evaluations showed a 43.5% improvement over the strongest neuro-symbolic baseline, with high symbolic rule coverage (94.3%) and strong clinical agreement. Under differential privacy with Conclusions: HEAL-AI demonstrates that federated neuro-symbolic learning combined with edge intelligence can deliver accurate, explainable, and privacy-preserving healthcare artificial intelligence (AI). The framework is well suited for real-world deployment in critical care, remote monitoring, and personalized clinical decision support. Index Terms: Federated learning, neuro-symbolic AI, smart healthcare, edge intelligence, personalized medicine, explainable AI, differential privacy, IoT healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.