Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958832›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Enhanced comfort and biomechanical performance of ejection seat cushions via optimal double-layer foam design.

Yixuan Guan, Yu Duan, Pengyan Zhou, Yongqi Xie, Qiuyu Liu, Jiayi Bao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yixuan GuanHangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yu DuanAir Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, China.
Pengyan ZhouSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yongqi XieSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Qiuyu LiuHangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiayi BaoSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Owing to inherent structural limitations of conventional single-layer ejection seat cushions, particularly their limited capacity for pressure redistribution, prolonged missions may be associated with inadequate comfort and impaired circulatory function. To address this issue, this study proposed a double-layer cushion design approach and compared three thickness ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:1) of fast-recovery (N1) and slow-recovery (N3) foam with a single-layer N3 cushion. Methods: Two experiments, a sitting comfort test and a material compression test, were conducted to evaluate comfort and mechanical performance. The comfort test (22 participants) collected subjective ratings and interface pressure metrics, while the compression test quantified deformation and load-bearing behavior, allowing comparison of comfort and support among the different cushion structures. Results: Results showed that as N3 thickness increased, maximum pressure ( Discussion: Overall, the double-layer design achieves an optimal trade-off between comfort and support, with the N1/N3=1:2 prototype exhibiting the superior performance. These findings provide a practical optimization strategy for developing high-performance seating systems.

Indexed as

comfort evaluationdouble-layer cushionejection seat cushionmechanical characterizationpressure distribution

Identifiers

PMID41958832
PMCPMC13057320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.