ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Long-term Outcomes of Esophageal Replacement in Children: A Multicenter Study by the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons.
Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Esophageal replacement (ER) remains a challenging but essential reconstructive procedure in pediatric surgery when the native esophagus cannot be preserved, most often in long-gap esophageal atresia (EA) and corrosive strictures. Data from India are limited, with most reports representing single-center experiences. This multicenter study by the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (IAPS) aimed to analyze national patterns, outcomes, and long-term results of pediatric ER. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, multicenter observational study was conducted across eight IAPS-affiliated institutions. Children under 18 years who underwent ER were included. Data regarding demographics, indications, conduit type, surgical route, timing of cervical anastomosis, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Statistical tests included Chi-square/Fisher's exact for group comparisons and penalized regression for exploratory assessment of risk factors for anastomotic complications. Results: Ninety-nine children (69 males, 30 females; mean age 22 months, mean weight 9.9 kg) were analyzed. EA was the indication in 89.9% and corrosive stricture in 10.1%. Gastric conduits were used in 98.9% - isoperistaltic gastric tube (48.5%), gastric transposition (GT) (24.2%), and reverse gastric tube (17.2%) - with only one colonic interposition. The posterior mediastinal route was used in 53 (53.5%) and the retrosternal in 46 (46.5%) children. Overall mortality was 4.04%, all in GT, with a mortality of 16.7% in transmediastinal GT in patients with EA, while nil in transmediastinal GT for corrosive injury, which were significantly bigger children. Early complications occurred in 30.3% and late in 25.3%, with anastomotic leak (13.1%) and stricture (13.1%) being the most common. Leak and stricture rates were higher after staged than primary anastomosis (19% vs. 8.8% and 19% vs. 7%, respectively; Conclusion: Pediatric esophageal replacement in India is most commonly performed for long-gap esophageal atresia using gastric conduits and is associated with acceptable mortality and satisfactory long-term quality of life. Anastomotic complications remain common and appear influenced by patient comorbidities and conduit route, emphasizing the need for standardized approaches and multicenter collaboration to improve outcomes. Discussion: Stomach-based conduits predominated in Indian practice due to their simplicity, vascular reliability, and adaptability to resource-limited settings. Retrosternal routing, though less anatomical, was often favored for its perceived safety and avoidance of mediastinal dissection. Leak and stricture rates were comparable to global data and appeared influenced more by comorbidities and conduit route than by staging or weight. The strong correlation between leak and later stricture underscores the importance of meticulous anastomotic technique and vigilant follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.