ArticleNeurocomputing2026
Deep Learning for analyzing chaotic dynamics in biological time series: Insights from frog heart signals.
Article in Neurocomputing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of experimental data is a relevant task in several physical, chemical and biological applications. In particular, the analysis of chaotic dynamics in cardiac systems is crucial as it can be related to certain pathological arrhythmias. When working with short and noisy experimental time series, some standard techniques for chaos detection cannot provide reliable results because of such data characteristics. Moreover, when small datasets are available, some Deep Learning techniques cannot be applied directly (that is, using part of the data to train the network, and using the trained network to analyze the remaining dataset). To overcome all these limitations, we propose an automatic algorithm that combines Deep Learning and some selection strategies based on a mathematical model of the same nature of the experimental data. To demonstrate its performance, we test it with experimental data obtained from ex-vivo frog heart experiments, achieving highly accurate results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.