Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958742›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Two Species Whose Ranges Are Shifting Uphill Are Not Pollen Limited, But Are More Successful Selfers Than Two Non-Shifting Species.

Inna Osmolovsky, Joshua M Botti-Anderson, Giancarlo M Chiarenza, Zoe A Xirocostas, Eve Slavich, Angela T Moles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inna OsmolovskyEvolution & Ecology Research Centre School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-6482
Joshua M Botti-AndersonFenner School of Environment and Society The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.
Giancarlo M ChiarenzaEvolution & Ecology Research Centre School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6277-6942
Zoe A XirocostasEvolution & Ecology Research Centre School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-5153
Eve SlavichStats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6520-6195
Angela T MolesEvolution & Ecology Research Centre School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-7762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species are expected to shift their ranges uphill in response to climate change and shifts to new ranges can be associated with changes in both positive and negative biotic interactions. We asked whether two uphill shifting species are more pollen limited at the upper range edge versus distribution core than are two non-shifting species and whether the two uphill shifting species reproduce more successfully through self-fertilisation (selfing) than the non-shifting species. We performed pollinator exclusion, open pollination and pollen supplementation experiments and counted pollen grains deposited on the stigmas of six alpine plant species native to Kosciuszko National Park, NSW, Australia. Counter to our hypothesis, the uphill shifting species in our study did not experience pollen limitation in any part of their distribution, while non-shifting species were more pollen limited in the core of their distribution than at range edges. However, the two uphill-shifting species did show higher selfing rates than did non-shifting species. Our results suggest that reproductive mechanisms may be non-uniform across species ranges, although the spatial variability of traits is seldom taken into account in predictive models. Although plant-pollinator interactions are often predicted to alter in the face of climate change, our study shows that some uphill-shifting plants may be able to maintain sufficient pollinator services.

Indexed as

climate changepollen depositionpollen limitationrange shiftsreproductive successselfing

Identifiers

PMID41958742
PMCPMC13058242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.