Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958720›Full record

ReviewAsia Pacific allergy2026

A systematic review of the outcomes of desensitization for delayed-type cutaneous adverse reactions induced by antituberculosis drugs.

Kanokkarn Pinyopornpanish, Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish, Suphawita Pliannuom, Chaisiri Angkurawaranon, Wannada Laisuan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia Pacific allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kanokkarn PinyopornpanishDivision Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kanokporn PinyopornpanishDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9068-3834
Suphawita PliannuomDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chaisiri AngkurawaranonDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Wannada LaisuanDivision of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis remains a significant global health concern, affecting millions of people worldwide. Treatment usually involves a combination of drugs; however, drug hypersensitivity reactions pose challenges, particularly due to the diversity of side effects. Cutaneous reactions are common, ranging from maculopapular rash to severe conditions such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic syndrome and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome. Rechallenge with the same drugs is often practiced, but desensitization has emerged as an alternative in the mitigation of reactions, especially in an outpatient setting. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Studies were included if they involved patients with tuberculosis receiving rechallenge or desensitization, reported postdesensitization outcomes, and were published in English. Data extraction and analysis were independently performed by 2 reviewers. Results: The literature search identified 4,560 potentially eligible articles, of which 7 studies comprising 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. Desensitization success rates ranged from 78.9% to 100% with a range of protocols employed across studies. Investigations such as patch tests and lymphocyte transformation tests have helped in ensuring accurate diagnosis and guided desensitization strategies. Conclusion: Desensitization is an effective strategy for the management of adverse reactions to antituberculosis drugs, particularly in cases of delayed cutaneous adverse reactions.

Indexed as

Antituberculosis drugscutaneous reactionsdesensitizationdrug hypersensitivityrechallengetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID41958720
PMCPMC13061011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.