ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Replication of the Association between Retinal Aging Clock Susceptibility Genes and Retinal Age Gap in an Asian Population: The Nagahama Study.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To replicate previously reported genetic associations for the retinal aging clock-quantified as the retinal age gap-in an East Asian population and to assess cross-ancestry consistency of effect directions and sizes. Design: Genetic association study with candidate-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) replication embedded in a population-based cohort. Participants: Individuals who participated in both first and second visits of the Nagahama Study with gradable fundus photographs and genome-wide genotype data. Methods: A deep learning model fine-tuned on an independent subset (i.e., data from participants who attended only one of the 2 visits of the Nagahama Study) was used to estimate retinal age from color fundus photographs. We tested 13 previously reported lead variants; 7 were evaluable in our dataset (directly or as available leads). Linear regression models adjusted for standard covariates estimated SNP effects on the retinal age gap at the first visit. Statistical significance was set as Bonferroni-corrected Main Outcome Measures: Association of previously reported retinal aging clock SNPs with the retinal age gap; number of loci meeting replication criteria; directional concordance; cross-study effect-size correlation. Results: Age-prediction accuracy in the genetic cohort showed mean absolute error = 3.00 (first visit) and 3.42 years (second visit). Of 13 variants to be replicated, 7 were testable. The lead variant rs17713879 ( Conclusions: In an East Asian population, we replicate the Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.