ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Telodendrimer nanotrap for selective cytokine removal from sepsis patient plasma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis remains difficult to treat, resulting in persistently high mortality, creating a significant clinical need for novel therapeutic approaches that provide precise immune modulation. A highly customizable telodendrimer nanotrap (TDNT) platform was developed to selectively remove inflammatory cytokines based on cytokine charge disparity and demonstrated improved survival in experimental murine sepsis. In this study, plasma from patients with abdominal sepsis was characterized for cytokine profiles and used to optimize the engineered TDNT resins for selective attenuation by targeting cytokine charge disparity. Methods: TDNT resins were screened against a spiked mixture of patient plasma, and three lead formulations were identified with different cytokine binding profiles. The correlation between individual patient cytokine profiles and clinical diagnosis was studied. The cytokine removal efficacy of the lead candidates was subsequently validated using 20 individual sepsis patient plasma samples for comparison with a commercial macroporous hemoperfusion resin. Results: After screening patient plasma, we optimized three lead nanotrap resins to selectively absorb either positively charged or negatively charged cytokines or to target universal cytokine removal. Upon validation in individual sepsis patient plasma, the selective cytokine binding profiles of the lead selective nanotrap resins were confirmed; however, overall cytokine clearance efficacy was moderate. The pan-affinitive TDNT resin effectively removes cytokines from patient plasma with comparable efficiency to the commercial MG250 Conclusion: Targeting cytokine charge disparity and total cytokine burden using TDNT resins with different cytokine binding profiles is promising for effectively addressing the dysregulated immune response in sepsis and reducing mortality, which warrants further testing in a large cohort of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.