ArticleJMA journal2026
Prescription for Change: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey on How Physicians' Relationships with Pharma Reps Are Associated with Views on Stricter Industry Guidelines.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Japan, the world's third-largest pharmaceutical market, introduced new guidelines in 2019 to address ethical concerns in pharmaceutical company-physician relationships. This study aimed to analyze Japanese physicians' attitudes toward these strengthened regulations. Methods: An online survey of 1,203 Japanese physicians was conducted in November 2019. Respondents were categorized based on their frequency of interaction with pharmaceutical companies: frequent (82, 6.8%), moderate (930, 77.3%), or rare (191, 15.9%). The survey assessed awareness of the new guidelines, perceived changes in promotional activities, and attitudes toward stricter regulations. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with opposition to the regulations. Results: A total of 640 (53.3%) respondents opposed stricter regulations, while 325 (27.1%) were in favor. Physicians with frequent (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio [aIRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.10) or moderate (aIRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89) interactions were more likely to oppose regulations compared with those with rare interactions. Hospital directors/managers, those affiliated with private institutions, and recent graduates also showed higher opposition. The main reason for favoring regulations was to promote healthy industry relationships (38, 9.3%), while the primary concern among those opposed was related to information gathering or potential patient disadvantages (88, 21.6%). Conclusions: The study reveals diverse views on industry-physician relations in Japan. Frequent interactions and leadership roles correlate with opposition to stricter regulations. The results suggest a need for balanced policies that consider varied perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.