ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development of a nursing follow-up checklist for adult ECMO-treated discharged patients: a Delphi consensus and feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Develop a nursing follow-up checklist for adult patients discharged after Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) surgery, providing a scientific and effective assessment tool for the continuous care services of surviving adult patients post-ECMO discharge. Methods: The first draft of the nursing follow-up checklist for adult patients discharged after ECMO therapy was developed through literature review, semi-structured interviews, and group discussions. In October 2025, two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were conducted, and modifications and improvements were made based on expert opinions and clinical realities, resulting in the final version of the follow-up checklist after content revision. Using convenience sampling, six nurses and ten adult patients discharged after ECMO therapy from a tertiary Grade A hospital in Wuhan City were selected as participants in November 2025 to preliminarily test the feasibility of the follow-up checklist, further evaluating and refining its content. Results: The expert response rates for the two rounds of correspondence were 86.67 and 100.00%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.93 and 0.90, with Kendall's concordance coefficient (W)s of 0.187 (χ Conclusion: The checklist is comprehensive in content, demonstrating good content validity, clinical feasibility, and high acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.