SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
AI-supported case-based learning in medical education: a comprehensive scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI-Assisted Progressive-Disclosure Case-Based Learning for Clinical Reasoning in Occupational Medicine: Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Application effect and teaching evaluation of case-based learning combined with ChatGPT in ophthalmology clinical teaching.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of a hybrid flipped classroom and case-based learning model on learning outcomes and competency development inFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent literature indicates that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is also being integrated into case-based learning (CBL) through activities such as clinical case generation, clinical reasoning support, and structured feedback. However, the evidence about GenAI's role in CBL remains fragmented. Given the diverse nature of available GenAI-CBL studies, we conducted a comprehensive scoping review to map and synthesize the evidence in this area, highlighting key themes, outcomes, challenges, and limitations to inform future research, curriculum development, and policies. Method: A comprehensive search was performed across multidisciplinary databases, including PubMed, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering publications from 2019 to 2025. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review and data extraction, were conducted independently by two reviewers using predefined eligibility criteria. The data synthesis involved thematic analysis to create an evidence map of GenAI-supported case-based and case-anchored learning in medical education. Results: The findings were organized into six key themes that showcase the role of GenAI in enhancing case-based learning, covering areas such as clinical reasoning and contextual thinking; efficient and scalable case creation; learner engagement, motivation, and perceived usefulness; accuracy, reliability, and ethical issues; faculty adaptation and pedagogical integration; and hybrid and reflective learning methods. Conclusion: Overall, the evidence indicates that GenAI can effectively support CBL in medical education, especially during early and intermediate stages. It also highlights the ongoing importance of faculty oversight and the need for further research to address advanced clinical judgment and ethical reasoning. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/28E3G, identifier (28E3G).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.