Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958527›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2026

The threat of pollutants mixtures on freshwater fishes in Sri Lankan lotic ecosystems under changing climate: a review of current status and future research perspective.

W A A N Wickramasinghe, K M S Ruvinda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

W A A N WickramasingheDepartment of Zoology and Environmental Management, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
K M S RuvindaDepartment of Zoology and Environmental Management, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple point and nonpoint sources add complex mixtures of pollutants that may pose detrimental impacts on freshwater fish. These pollutants include metallic and nonmetallic inorganic ions and an array of organic compounds. Climate-related scenarios and a mixture of contaminants entering riverine ecosystems have impacted many endemic freshwater fish species in Sri Lanka. The present research aims to identify morphological, physiological, and behavioral changes upon exposure to xenobiotics and to predict the influence of climate on these fishes. We discussed the biomarker responses of feral fish, combined with their physicochemical characterization. Moreover, the discussion emphasized empirical evidence from controlled laboratory experiments. Together, these elements were used to interpret the possible future impacts of climate change on the fish in lotic ecosystems. The effects of nanoparticles, microplastics, pharmaceuticals, and endocrine disruptors, and their interplay with climate-related physicochemical variation, have been identified as a research gap. The primary research directions for the future include establishing multi-stressor experimental frameworks that integrate a mixture of xenobiotic exposures of indigenous fishes. The development of standardized biological monitoring protocols that simulate real-world conditions in lotic ecosystems is crucial. Introduction of scientific, evidence-based, robust, and urgent legislative reforms to regulate cumulative pollution may provide a strong legal framework to prevent devastating impacts on freshwater fishes in lotic ecosystems in Sri Lanka.

Indexed as

biodiversity conservationbiological monitoringbiomarkercocktail effectlegislative reformsriverine ecosystemxenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID41958527
PMCPMC13056829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.