ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
Assessing the Effect of Rural Placements Through a Pre-Post Approach With Different Temporal Targets: Are We Converting or Sustaining?
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reflections on the Evolving Contribution of the Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training Programme.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRural placements are a key strategy to attract health students to rural practice. It is important that robust research methods are used to assess the effect of placements on rural career intentions to inform resource allocation and student supports.
objectivesThis study explored the utility of a novel rural attitude measurement approach to evaluate the direct impact of rural placements on students' perceptions and intentions. It also examined whether anticipated differences between students from city and rural backgrounds emerged across various future temporal reference points. Finally, the research investigated the characteristics of students who demonstrated desirable rural placement outcomes, specifically those who either 'converted' to or 'sustained' an early career attraction to rural practice.
methodThis research employed a pre-post cohort design, surveying health students who were commencing an Australian rural placement. Participants included those from Charles Sturt University as well as students from other universities receiving support from Three Rivers Department of Rural Health. A total of 163 matched pre- and post-placement surveys were collected. The survey measured ratings of the attractiveness of living and working outside of a Major City area across two future timepoints: (1) during the early years of practice (1-3 years after graduation) and (2) after establishing a career (10-15 years after graduation), using an 11-point scale.
resultsMost respondents were from a rural background (78%), 29% had care responsibilities, and 36% were aged 30 years and older. Overall, only mid-career attraction significantly increased from pre-placement levels; however, important differences were identified among subgroups.
conclusionsRural placement experiences serve a 'sustaining' function for those already committed to, and likely located in, rural areas. The desired 'converting' effect of rural placements may be constrained under current RHMT Program scope for health students, especially those from city areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.