Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958318›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2026

Social Structure and Interactions Differentially Shape Aerotolerant and Anaerobic Gut Microbiomes in a Cooperative Breeding Species.

Chuen Zhang Lee, Sarah F Worsley, Terry Burke, Jan Komdeur, Falk Hildebrand, Hannah L Dugdale, David S Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chuen Zhang LeeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-657X
Sarah F WorsleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.
Terry BurkeEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jan KomdeurGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Falk HildebrandSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.
Hannah L DugdaleGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
David S RichardsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR13631Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008717/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X011054/1Earlham Institute ISP Decoding Biodiversity BBS/E/ER/230002AEarlham Institute ISP Decoding Biodiversity BBS/E/ER/230002BEarlham Institute ISP Decoding Biodiversity BBX011089/1European Research Council erc-stg-948219 EPYCLeverhulme Trust ECF-2023-433Natural Environment Research Council NE/S010939/1Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 823.01.014Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 854.11.003Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ALWOP.531Rosalind Franklin Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social transmission of microbes has profound impacts on disease epidemiology and host health. However, how social factors influence gut microbiome (GM) transmission in wild populations is not well understood. Here, we use a wild population of the Seychelles warbler, a facultative cooperatively breeding passerine, to determine whether cooperative breeding behaviour influences the GM. Specifically, we hypothesise that close social interactions as part of cooperative breeding should encourage the sharing of anaerobic microbes, which may be less likely to transmit indirectly through the environment. We found that GM composition was more similar within versus between social groups, and this effect was driven by sharing both aerotolerant and anaerobic bacterial genera. As predicted, the similarity of anaerobic, but not aerotolerant, GM communities between pairs of individuals within a group was positively correlated with the strength of their social interactions (defined by their cooperative breeding status). Specifically, anaerobic GM composition was more similar between pairs of individuals that cooperate at the nest (dominant breeders and dominant-helper pairs) than for non-cooperative pairs (involving non-helping subordinate individuals). This is likely because breeders and helpers directly interact while caring for offspring at a nest. This work reveals how cooperative social interactions lead to microbial transmission and thus contribute to shaping specific components of a host's gut microbiome.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSocial BehaviorSongbirdsAnimalsBreedingFemaleAcrocephalus sechellensiscooperative breedinggut microbiomesocial transmissionwild population

Identifiers

PMID41958318
PMCPMC13066922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.