ArticleMolecular ecology2026
Social Structure and Interactions Differentially Shape Aerotolerant and Anaerobic Gut Microbiomes in a Cooperative Breeding Species.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age-related changes in the gut microbiota of a long-lived seabird suggest divergence from mammalian models.Royal Society open science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social transmission of microbes has profound impacts on disease epidemiology and host health. However, how social factors influence gut microbiome (GM) transmission in wild populations is not well understood. Here, we use a wild population of the Seychelles warbler, a facultative cooperatively breeding passerine, to determine whether cooperative breeding behaviour influences the GM. Specifically, we hypothesise that close social interactions as part of cooperative breeding should encourage the sharing of anaerobic microbes, which may be less likely to transmit indirectly through the environment. We found that GM composition was more similar within versus between social groups, and this effect was driven by sharing both aerotolerant and anaerobic bacterial genera. As predicted, the similarity of anaerobic, but not aerotolerant, GM communities between pairs of individuals within a group was positively correlated with the strength of their social interactions (defined by their cooperative breeding status). Specifically, anaerobic GM composition was more similar between pairs of individuals that cooperate at the nest (dominant breeders and dominant-helper pairs) than for non-cooperative pairs (involving non-helping subordinate individuals). This is likely because breeders and helpers directly interact while caring for offspring at a nest. This work reveals how cooperative social interactions lead to microbial transmission and thus contribute to shaping specific components of a host's gut microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.