SynthesisPsychological medicine2026
Inflammatory cytokine alterations in genetic and clinical high risk groups of psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInflammation has been implicated in psychosis, but its role in individuals at clinical (CHR) and genetic (GHR) high-risk remains unclear. We therefore conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare circulating cytokine levels across CHR, GHR, and healthy control (HC) groups.
methodsWe systematically searched multiple databases up to February 2025, extracting cytokine levels (plasma/serum) from CHR, GHR, and HC groups. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Given that no direct head-to-head comparisons between CHR and GHR were available, indirect comparisons were performed through the common comparator (HC). The transitivity assumption was assessed by comparing key study and participant characteristics across comparisons.
resultsThirty studies were included (CHR: 1601, GHR: 675, HC: 1980). NMA estimates indicated higher IL-6 levels in CHR compared with GHR, while IL-6 and IL-1β levels were lower in GHR compared with HC. In pairwise subgroup analyses, CHR converters showed higher IL-13 levels than non-converters. The evidence network was sparse and star-shaped, with all CHR-GHR estimates relying exclusively on indirect comparisons.
conclusionsThis study represents the first NMA to synthesize cytokine alterations in individuals at high risk for psychosis using indirect evidence. Elevated IL-6 in CHR individuals suggests immune activation, whereas reduced IL-6 in GHR may reflect a distinct immune profile. Increased IL-13 levels in converters highlight potential involvement of Th2-related pathways during transition to psychosis. However, the sparse nature of the evidence network necessitates cautious interpretation of the findings, and larger, standardized multi-center studies are required for confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.