ReviewMuscle & nerve2026
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells in Myasthenia Gravis: Advances, Safety Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in neuroimmune diseases: mechanistic rationale, clinical experience, and translational challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review examines the emerging application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG), with emphasis on safety, efficacy signals, and future therapeutic potential in treatment-refractory disease. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2025, using the terms "CAR T-cell," "chimeric antigen receptor," and "myasthenia gravis." Eligible reports included clinical trials, case reports, case series, and mechanistic studies describing CAR T-cell therapy outcomes in MG. Across five independent case series, seven patients receiving CAR T-cells targeting CD19, BCMA, or bispecific antigens showed consistent clinical improvement. Peak expansion occurred 8-22 days postinfusion, with persistence of 28 to ~180 days. Despite small cohorts, safety in CAR T-cell therapy was favorable versus oncology, with mainly Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome, rare immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity, and no severe or life-threatening events. Seven registered trials (> 260 patients) are expected to conclude between 2026 and 2029. Overall, CAR T-cell therapy shows substantial promise for treatment-refractory MG, potentially offering greater durability than existing therapies with an acceptable safety profile. Nevertheless, current evidence is restricted to small, uncontrolled studies, and long-term efficacy, durability, and optimal patient selection require validation in larger controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.