Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958278›Full record

ReviewMuscle & nerve2026

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells in Myasthenia Gravis: Advances, Safety Challenges, and Future Directions.

Tobias Hegelmaier, Alexander Duscha, Christiane Desel, Sarah Stassen, Tim Krzemien, Ann-Katrin Hennemann, Vaia Pappa, Aiden Haghikia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tobias HegelmaierDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Alexander DuschaDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christiane DeselDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sarah StassenDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Tim KrzemienDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ann-Katrin HennemannDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Vaia PappaDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Aiden HaghikiaDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-3298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the emerging application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG), with emphasis on safety, efficacy signals, and future therapeutic potential in treatment-refractory disease. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2025, using the terms "CAR T-cell," "chimeric antigen receptor," and "myasthenia gravis." Eligible reports included clinical trials, case reports, case series, and mechanistic studies describing CAR T-cell therapy outcomes in MG. Across five independent case series, seven patients receiving CAR T-cells targeting CD19, BCMA, or bispecific antigens showed consistent clinical improvement. Peak expansion occurred 8-22 days postinfusion, with persistence of 28 to ~180 days. Despite small cohorts, safety in CAR T-cell therapy was favorable versus oncology, with mainly Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome, rare immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity, and no severe or life-threatening events. Seven registered trials (> 260 patients) are expected to conclude between 2026 and 2029. Overall, CAR T-cell therapy shows substantial promise for treatment-refractory MG, potentially offering greater durability than existing therapies with an acceptable safety profile. Nevertheless, current evidence is restricted to small, uncontrolled studies, and long-term efficacy, durability, and optimal patient selection require validation in larger controlled trials.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveMyasthenia GravisReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesHumansReceptors, Chimeric Antigenautoimmune neuromuscular disordersCAR T‐cell therapyCD19/BCMA/CAAR T‐cells and B cell depletionmyasthenia gravis

Identifiers

PMID41958278
PMCPMC13138368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.