ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026
DEEP-DISORDER: Motion Correction in 3D MRI via Segment Reconstruction and Registration.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D MR image acquisition is inherently time intensive, rendering it susceptible to patient motion during scanning. This may introduce significant blurring and artifacts, potentially necessitating reacquisition. We propose a modular framework to retrospectively correct for intrascan motion in 3D brain MRI, without active motion tracking. Serving as the backbone of our approach is an existing distributed and incoherent sampling scheme (DISORDER), combined with a fast network trained for highly undersampled reconstruction. This enables approximate reconstructions of anatomy after every few seconds, using only a tiny fraction of k-space data (< 2%). While these reconstructions are only approximate, we postulate they are sufficient to estimate motion patterns at said temporal resolution. Groupwise registration, notable for its elimination of registration bias, is utilized for estimating rigid motion parameters, which are leveraged to reconstruct the measured data with reduced motion artifacts. The approach was evaluated on 94 retrospectively and 3 prospectively motion-corrupted in vivo 3D T1-weighted brain MRI acquisitions. The estimated motion parameters matched the known retrospective motion with 0.06 mm and 0.13° accuracy, resulting in an improvement in reconstruction quality from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.