Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958178›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026

Accelerating PREFUL MRI: Comparison of Registration Methods and Impact of Time Series Reduction.

A Voskrebenzev, G H Pöhler, F Klimeš, M M Klein, R A Müller, F Wacker, J M Hohlfeld, J Vogel-Claussen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A VoskrebenzevInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-1841
G H PöhlerClinic for Radiology, Universital Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
F KlimešInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-0757
M M KleinInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
R A MüllerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-7355
F WackerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J M HohlfeldBiomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany.
J Vogel-ClaussenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

German Center of Lung Research (DZL)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether accelerated registration and reduced acquisition times preserve the robustness of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI, thereby improving clinical feasibility by facilitating integration into tight time slots and enabling faster turnaround of results. PREFUL MRI at 1.5 T was retrospectively analyzed in 28 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 56 healthy volunteers. Image registration was performed using Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) and Forsberg. Time series (TS) were truncated from 55 to 45, 30, and 15 s per slice. The 55-s variant was evaluated twice to assess potential nondeterministic effects; the first served as the reference. PREFUL parameters, including regional ventilation, quantified perfusion (QQ), flow volume loop correlation metric (FVL-CM) and corresponding defect percentages, were compared across registration methods and TS lengths using Wilcoxon tests, Pearson correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and regional overlap analysis. Forsberg reduced computation time by ~20-fold (3 vs. 58 min per slice) while maintaining trends and repeatability. Although functional values were slightly lower and defect scores higher, correlations between registrations exceeded 90% for most parameters, with regional overlap ≥ 97% in healthy volunteers and ≥ 80% in COPD patients. Shortening the TS to 30 s introduced minor deviations but preserved overlap (≥ 79%) and strong correlations (≥ 77%) compared with 55 s, except for QQ. Larger deviations occurred primarily at 15 s. Repeatability remained moderate to high (ICC ≥ 68%) for all parameters, except QQ, down to 30 s, with the FVL-CM, perfusion defect percentage and amount of nondefect regions in COPD being most stable (ICC ≥ 72%). Forsberg provides results comparable to ANTs at a fraction of the processing time, enabling PREFUL analysis within a practical timeframe. Acquisition for each slice may be reduced to 30 s without compromising robustness, supporting more efficient protocols, although caution is warranted for QQ.

Indexed as

LungMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReproducibility of ResultsTime Factorsfunctional pulmonary proton MRIimage registrationoptimizationperfusion/ventilation (V/Q)PREFUL (eight max)repeatability

Identifiers

PMID41958178
PMCPMC13066768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.