ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Examining the relationship between cesarean section scar and endometrial cancer.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) has been increasing annually. Studies have reported that cesarean section (CS) is associated with a higher risk of developing EC than vaginal delivery (VD). However, few studies have examined the relationship between CS and EC development.
methodsData were extracted from the medical records of patients with EC and a history of childbirth who underwent EC treatment at 3 institutions. Factors contributing to EC development were analyzed between April 2010 and December 2024.
resultsAmong patients EC and a history of childbirth, 8.7% (69/794) had undergone CS, and 50.7% (35/69) developed a CS scar. Compared with patients who had a VD or those without a CS scar, patients with a CS scar showed significantly shorter intervals from delivery to EC onset (VD: p=0.013; non-CS scar: p=0.031). A narrower residual myometrial thickness/adjacent myometrial thickness (RMT/AMT) ratio of the CS scar was significantly associated with a shorter interval from the last delivery to EC onset (p=0.034) and was independently associated with earlier EC onset after the last delivery in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p<0.001 and p=0.030, respectively).
conclusionA narrower RMT/AMT ratio in the CS scar was considerably associated with a shorter interval from the last delivery to EC onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.