Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958022›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary anthropology2026

What Is the Acheulean?

Marie-Helene Moncel, Carolina Cucart-Mora, Marta Arzarello, Nick Ashton, Javier Baena, Deborah Barsky, Ignacio de la Torre, Nena Galanidou, Paula García-Medrano, Christine Hertler and 11 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Marie-Helene MoncelUMR 7194 - CNRS- Histoire Naturelle des Humanités préhistoriques, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-786X
Carolina Cucart-MoraUMR 7194 - CNRS- Histoire Naturelle des Humanités préhistoriques, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-292X
Marta ArzarelloDipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Nick AshtonDepartment Britain, Europe & Prehistory, British Museum, Franks House, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-3892
Javier BaenaDepartment of Prehistory and Archaeology, Autonomous University of Madrid (Campus Campoblanco), Madrid, Spain.
Deborah BarskyInstitut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Tarragona, Spain.
Ignacio de la TorreDepartment of Archaeology, Institute of History, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1805-634X
Nena GalanidouDepartment of History and Archaeology, University of Crete, Greece.
Paula García-MedranoUMR 7194 - CNRS- Histoire Naturelle des Humanités préhistoriques, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-1019
Christine HertlerROCEEH Research Center, Senckenberg Research Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gadi HerzlingerSchool of Archaeology and Maritime Cultures, The Zinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Israel.
Thomas IngiccoUMR 7194 - CNRS- Histoire Naturelle des Humanités préhistoriques, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France.
Hao LiState Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dongdong MaKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Marina MosqueraInstitut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Tarragona, Spain.
Andreu OlléInstitut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Tarragona, Spain.
Shanti PappuSchool of Interwovern Science and Arts, Krea University, Sri City, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Shuwen PeiKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chun TianInstitute of Cultural Heritage, Shandong University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China.
Wei WangInstitute of Cultural Heritage, Shandong University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China.
Christopher J BaeDepartment of Anthropology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Acheulean represents the longest cultural period known to human history, lasting globally for more than 1.75 million years. It may have emerged as early as 1.95 Ma in Africa, spreading throughout much of the continent and then into Eurasia and lasting up to 350-200 ka in western Europe and South Asia, and even later in eastern Asia. Originally defined in the 1870s, the term Acheulean is one of the earliest and most contested classifications in prehistoric archaeology. Almost 150 years after its first appearance, it remains a source of continuous debate. This paper summarizes roundtable discussions that took place at the Musée de l'Homme (Paris) in November 2025 that focused on the meaning of the Acheulean and the diversity of its manifestations across Eurasia. Some 20 researchers, from various institutions across Europe, Asia, and the Pacific participated in this event, during which it became clear that the Acheulean had different meanings to the participants. Among the major points raised during the meeting was the question of how different specialists differentiate the Acheulean from the older Oldowan techno-complex, with specificities emerging from each of their respective regions of study. The geographic origins and hominin species' attribution of the Acheulean toolmakers were also brought to the fore since important questions have been raised in the last decades by the growing record of hominin taxa that existed during this timeframe across Eurasia and the relatively late arrival of this techno-complex in Europe. These issues become even more important when we consider the recent evidence emanating out of Asia, which indicates that hominins were present well before their earliest appearance in Europe. The purpose of this paper is not only to make a statement regarding how to define the Acheulean, but also to illustrate its diversity across Eurasia.

Indexed as

HominidaeTechnologyTool Use BehaviorAnimalsArchaeologyEuropeHistory, AncientHumansAcheuleanearly pleistoceneEurasiaMiddle Pleistocene (Chibanian)palaeolithic

Identifiers

PMID41958022
PMCPMC13066721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.