ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Nationwide Study on the Cervical Cancer Screening Pathway in Estonia.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changing burden of cancers related to human papillomavirus in Estonia: a population-based registry study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective cervical cancer screening and progress toward WHO elimination targets depend on complete follow-up for women with positive primary screening tests. However, real-world data on this critical step in hrHPV-based screening programs in Eastern Europe are scarce. We conducted a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study in Estonia, analyzing records from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund and Population Register. We included 44,282 women aged 30-65 who were invited to hrHPV-based screening between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, with follow-up through March 31, 2024. Screening attendance was 45.7% (n = 20,242; 95% CI: 45.2%-46.2%), with 8.0% (n = 1615; 95% CI: 7.6%-8.4%) testing hrHPV-positive. A substantial loss to follow-up was observed: 57.7% of hrHPV-positive women did not undergo repeat hrHPV testing, colposcopy, or any post-colposcopy care within 12 months. Among those referred for further diagnosis, colposcopy was performed in 77.9% within 6 months. Treatment for High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) cases was high (85.5%; n = 124; 95% CI: 78.7%-90.5%), mostly within 3 months. Predictors of lower follow-up adherence included older age and residence in South Estonia. Suboptimal screening uptake and high loss to follow-up among hrHPV-positive women are significant barriers to effective cervical cancer prevention in Estonia. These challenges mirror those seen in many organized screening programs globally. Prioritizing strategies to enhance follow-up adherence is critical for timely diagnosis and treatment, ultimately accelerating global efforts toward cervical cancer elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.