SynthesisBJS open2025
Association of the gut microbiome to colorectal anastomotic leakage: systematic review.
Synthesis in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch into the gut microbiome and its possible association with anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery has increased recently with the growing availability of sequencing techniques. There is a lack of systematic reviews addressing specifically microbiomic differences between patients with anastomotic leakage and patients with a successful anastomotic healing. The objective was to systematically review the current research on the microbiome and its effect on the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer.
methodsPubmed/Medline, Cochrane, and Google scholar were searched on 14th February 2025, to identify relevant publications with the following inclusion criteria: colorectal surgery, microbiome sequencing data, anastomotic leakage as endpoint, and comparative groups. Exclusion criteria were studies conducted exclusively on animals, non-peer-reviewed studies, review articles, and unavailable full text. Alpha/beta diversity and microbiomic functional analyses were the focus of the results.
resultsFrom 112 studies, 11 studies including 551 patients were included: 143 patients with anastomotic leakage and 408 as controls. Alpha diversity differences were found in 7 of 11 studies-1 of 4 with preoperative sampling versus 6 of 7 studies with intra/postoperative sampling (P = 0.044). Beta diversity differences were found in 5 of 11 studies. Three studies reported on functional analyses, with one study demonstrating an association between methanogenesis and anastomotic leakage. Bacterial abundance was inconsistent across the studies. Three studies involving rodent models indicated a causal effect of the clinical microbiome.
conclusionEvidence implicates the gut microbiome as a factor associated with anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery, with three studies suggesting a causal relationship. There is a shortage of studies evaluating cross-species functional profiling. Optimal sampling should be performed during surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.