Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957913›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2026

Reliability and Validity of Ankle Muscle Strength Testing Using the ISOTIB Device.

Sean Drew, Sean A Horan, Steven Duhig

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean DrewSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8120-7478
Sean A HoranSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4468-0891
Steven DuhigSchool of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne repetition maximum (1RM) testing is recognised as a reliable and valid method for determining maximum muscle strength. However, there are limited reports in the literature for measuring maximum ankle strength using free-weight methods. The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a novel free-weight device (ISOTIB) used to measure ankle strength.

methodsFifteen healthy, recreationally active, adults (male = 10, female = 5, age = 29.7 ± 4.4 years) volunteered for the study, attending two sessions 1 week apart. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC

resultsThe ISOTIB exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for maximal dorsiflexion (ICC

conclusionThe ISOTIB demonstrated excellent reliability and validity, suggesting it is a viable tool for assessing maximal ankle strength. The ISOTIB offers a practical alternative to current methods, which are typically expensive and utilise large immovable devices.

Indexed as

AnkleAnkle JointMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle Strength DynamometerReproducibility of Resultselectromyographyfoot and ankleinstabilitymuscle strength dynamometerresistance training

Identifiers

PMID41957913
PMCPMC13065896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.