ArticleBMC nutrition2026
Ultra-processed food consumption among university students: application of front-of-package-based nutrient profiling scores and associations with physical activity and body composition.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutrition, Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity in Undergraduate Students: A Scoping Review with PRISMA-ScR Checklist.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Habitual salt addition and self-reported cardiometabolic conditions among Saudi university students: a multi-region cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent modernization of food processes and Westernized lifestyles have raised concerns about the increased consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods (UPF). Evidence links UPF consumption to the prevalence of several chronic diseases. Higher UPF consumption correlates with higher fat mass (FM) and lower fat-free mass (FFM), alongside with higher levels of sedentary behavior and lower levels of physical activity (PA) in adults. However, the evidence in university students is still scarce. This study aimed to characterize UPF consumption in university students from the School of Medicine, University of Lisbon and test its association with body composition (BC) and PA. Additionally, these associations were also investigated in regard to UPF nutritional content.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional observational study with a sample of 163 Portuguese university students. Dietary intake was assessed through two non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls. UPF were classified using the NOVA system and front-of-package-based nutrient profiling systems (Nutri-Score and Traffic Light). BC was assessed through anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance, and PA and sedentary time (ST) through accelerometry. Independent-sample t-tests/Mann-Whitney tests and Chi-square tests assessed differences between groups. Associations were examined using Spearman’s correlations.
resultsUPF contributed to 24.8% of total energy intake (TEI). There were no associations between UPF and BC or PA. FSAm-NPS DI-NS and FSAm-NPS DI-TL were negatively associated with FFM (rho=-0.232, p = 0.003; rho=-0.237, p = 0.003; respectively) and positively associated with ST (rho = 0.238, p = 0.002; rho = 0.245, p = 0.002; respectively).
conclusionsOne-quarter of students’ TEI comes from UPF, aligning with national data. Our findings suggest that the consumption of UPF with worse nutrient profiles is related to lower FFM and higher ST. Enhancing nutrition literacy among university students may foster healthier food choices, potentially improving BC and ST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.