Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957844›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Intensive Interaction for children and young people with profound and multiple learning disabilities (INTERACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial, economic evaluation and process evaluation.

Kerry J Bell, Jill Bradshaw, Judy Clegg, Katie Whiteside, Kalpita Baird, Charlie Peck, Arabella Scantlebury, Han-I Wang, Joy Adamson, Amanda Allard and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Kerry J BellYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. kerry.bell@york.ac.uk.
Jill BradshawIntellectual Disabilities Research Institute, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Judy CleggSchool of Allied Health, Pharmacy, Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Katie WhitesideYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Kalpita BairdYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Charlie PeckYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Arabella ScantleburyCentre for Evidence and Implementation Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Han-I WangYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Joy AdamsonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Amanda AllardCouncil for Disabled Children, London, UK.
Jane E BlackwellYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Katie CarlisleYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Imogen FountainYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Nick GoreIntellectual Disabilities Research Institute, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Fliss KyffinSchool of Education, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Jennifer MillerPromoting a More Inclusive Society (PAMIS), Dundee, UK.
Adenike OkanlawonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Lindsay PenningtonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Lyn Robinson-SmithYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Sarah RonaldsonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Emma StandleyYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Joanne SweeneyIntellectual Disabilities Research Institute, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lucy ZieglerPatient and Public Involvement and Engagement Representative, Leeds, London, UK.
Catherine HewittYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR151428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication interventions can facilitate communication between people with profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD) and familiar partners such as family and educational setting staff, including speech and language therapists. Various communication interventions are routinely used but their clinical and cost-effectiveness are unclear. Intensive Interaction (II) is one intervention that focuses on early interaction abilities. II can be delivered by staff in educational settings and/or at home. Despite many settings already implementing II, staff are sometimes untrained or have not received up to date training, potentially leading to inconsistencies in how the technique is applied and the quality of the interactions. We will provide structured training in II to educational setting staff and parents/carers with coordinated activities developed jointly for each child/young person to be delivered within the educational setting and at home. This study aims to establish whether Intensive Interaction delivered within educational settings improves communication skills of children and young people with PMLD.

methodsA multi-site pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial comparing usual care with Intensive Interaction and usual care. Clusters will be educational settings. This study will recruit 330 participants (aged 3-25 years) with PMLD from 66 educational settings within Great Britain. Each participant will have a corresponding teacher, parent/carer, and interventionist. Potential participants will be screened by their educational setting for eligibility prior to giving informed consent. Data will be collected at baseline, 32 weeks, and 52 weeks post-randomisation and will assess health and educational outcomes including participants' communication skills, behaviour, wellbeing, and quality of life. The primary outcome is communication skills, measured by the Communication Complexity Scale (CCS) at 32 weeks post-randomisation. Setting staff will video record an interaction with each participating child/young person. Communication will be coded by members of the research team blinded to allocation using the CCS. DISCUSSION: This study addresses a much used but currently under-researched intervention and results will inform the support provided to children and young people with PMLD in their educational settings and at home.

trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry on 3rd May 2023 (registration number: ISRCTN81099965, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN81099965 ).

Indexed as

Child BehaviorCommunicationLearning DisabilitiesAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomCommunicationEducationIntensive interactionParent carersProfound and multiple learning disabilitiesSpeech and language therapy

Identifiers

PMID41957844
PMCPMC13173860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.