ArticleBMC biology2026
Total-evidence phylogeny reveals recent crown group radiation and biogeographical history of hamsters.
Article in BMC biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Total-evidence phylogeny reveals recent crown group radiation and biogeographical history of hamsters.BMC biology · 2026Article
- New insights into the genusPeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe systematics of extant hamsters (Cricetinae) have been increasingly clarified, due to advances in molecular phylogenetics. In contrast, their relationships with their fossil relatives have remained relatively unclear. Furthermore, studies on the biogeographical history and divergence times of the main groups of extant hamsters have so far been limited to molecular phylogenies and node dating approaches.
resultsHere, we present the first 'total-evidence' analysis of hamsters that combines extinct and extant taxa, based on a comprehensive dataset covering 82 species (~ 75% of the total known diversity of 109 species). We performed a relaxed-clock Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction and used the resulting tip-dated tree to estimate ancestral geographic ranges. Our results confirm '†Kowalskia' as a synonym of †Neocricetodon, support the previously suggested non-monophyly of †Allocricetus, †Cricetulodon, and '†Cricetinus' and reveal several fossil taxa as potential close relatives of the crown group. We recover a Pliocene origin of the crown hamsters, considerably younger than previous estimates of a late/middle Miocene origin. Our biogeographic reconstructions suggest a Central and Eastern European origin of the entire group, with crown hamsters emerging in the region around the Black Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean. Subsequent dispersal events into Western Europe and East Central Asia may be linked to the expansion of open vegetation.
conclusionsBased on a total-evidence phylogenetic reconstruction, we highlight necessary taxonomical revisions for several fossil cricetine taxa and explore the biogeographical evolution of the group. Importantly, our estimated divergence dates reveal a substantially younger group of crown hamsters than previously assumed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.