Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957804›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026

Community participation in responding to health misinformation.

Regina Mariam Namata Kamoga, Ranjit Kaur Pritam Singh, Emma Andrews, Sally Snow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Regina Mariam Namata KamogaCommunity Health And Information Network (CHAIN), Kampala, Uganda.
Ranjit Kaur Pritam SinghAsia Pacific Oncology Alliance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-8934
Emma AndrewsPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Sally SnowStudio Health, London, UK. sally@studio-health.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2190-8188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responses to health misinformation increasingly emphasize the importance of community engagement, yet the role of participation and power sharing remains under-theorized and inconsistently described in the peer-reviewed literature. Drawing on findings from the systematic review Overcoming Health Misinformation in Marginalized Groups, which examined 32 studies evaluating approaches to tackling health misinformation, we reflect on how the depth and quality of community participation shape trust, engagement, and intervention success. We argue that sustained partnership, shared decision-making, and local ownership enhance message credibility and reach by embedding health information within trusted social contexts. We propose strengthening equity-focused responses through structured reporting tools that center power, trust, and co-production as practical design principles rather than implementation add-ons. Making participation visible is critical if community engagement is to move beyond rhetoric and contribute meaningfully to addressing health misinformation in contexts of low institutional trust.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity ParticipationHumansTrust

Identifiers

PMID41957804
PMCPMC13067414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.