ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Effect of Q-angle symmetry on knee joint kinematics in level walking, upslope walking and landing task.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Effect of Q-angle symmetry on knee joint kinematics in level walking, upslope walking and landing task.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe quadriceps angle (Q-angle) is a key biomechanical measure of lower limb alignment. While its asymmetry is linked to knee disorders like patellofemoral pain, its dynamic impact on full six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) knee kinematics across different tasks remains unclear.
methodsForty healthy university students were categorized into Q-angle symmetric (QS, bilateral difference ≤ 3°) or asymmetric (QA, > 3°) groups. Knee 6DOF kinematics were captured during level walking, 10% upslope walking, and landing task using a 3D motion capture system. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and Kujala score were assessed at baseline and 18-month follow-up. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D) was used for kinematic analysis.
resultsDuring level walking, the QA group showed greater internal rotation at 69-74% gait cycle (GC) (p = 0.042) and altered flexion/extension at 75-90% GC (p = 0.012). During upslope walking, the QA group exhibited different flexion/extension at 74-87% GC (p = 0.018). No kinematic differences were found in any 6DOF parameter during landing task. At 18 months, there were no significant intergroup differences in IPAQ, VAS, or Kujala scores (all p > 0.05).
conclusionQ-angle asymmetry induces task- and phase-specific alterations in knee angular kinematics during walking tasks but does not affect translational kinematics or short-term functional outcomes in healthy young adults. Its biomechanical effect is limited and context-dependent, suggesting caution in using it as a standalone risk marker for knee injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.