Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957775›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Explainable machine learning prediction of functional independence measure scores and gain in subacute stroke survivors.

Yuta Miyazaki, Junna Oba, Tetsuo Ishikawa, Michiyuki Kawakami, Kunitsugu Kondo, Akiko Hirabe, Masahiro Tsujikawa, Kaoru Honaga, A Gordon Robertson, Scott E Woodman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuta Miyazaki *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Junna Oba *Department of Extended Intelligence for Medicine, The Ishii-Ishibashi Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo Ishikawa *Department of Extended Intelligence for Medicine, The Ishii-Ishibashi Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Michiyuki KawakamiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan. michiyukikawakami@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-3325
Kunitsugu KondoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Akiko HirabeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Masahiro TsujikawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Kaoru HonagaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
A Gordon RobertsonDxige Research Inc., Courtenay, BC, Canada.
Scott E WoodmanDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Tetsuya TsujiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP25K21344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional regression models struggle with non-linear data, limiting their ability to predict health outcomes such as activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke survivors. Machine learning (ML) methods offer improved accuracy but often lack interpretability. Explainable ML (XML) algorithms, including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), promise both precision and interpretability. This study aimed to develop interpretable XML-based prediction models for discharge ADL in subacute stroke survivors and to identify key prognostic factors.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 980 subacute stroke survivors admitted to the Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital between March 2015 and September 2019. Thirty-three explanatory variables, including age, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems, physical function measures, and nutritional assessments, were used to predict discharge FIM scores and FIM gain (motor, cognitive, total). Predictive models were developed using six algorithms (Elastic Net, Extra Trees, LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost, and their combinations - Mixed), and accuracy was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²) and root mean squared error (RMSE). Variable importance was quantified using SHAP scores.

resultsMaximum R² values for motor, cognitive, and discharge total FIM scores were 0.776, 0.630, and 0.758, respectively. Those for FIM gain were 0.604, 0.413, and 0.536, respectively. SHAP scores highlighted the importance of age, trunk function, and grip strength. Furthermore, low-difficulty FIM motor subitems were significant predictors of total scores, whereas high-difficulty subitems were critical for FIM gain.

conclusionsXML achieved predictive performance comparable to reported parsimonious ML models, while providing higher clinical granular interpretability. By utilizing SHAP values, this approach overcomes the ‘black box’ nature of standard ML, providing transparent and actionable insights into how individual functional deficits contribute to outcomes. Notably, the predictive accuracy for FIM gain improved significantly compared to previous studies. Even without explicitly incorporating domain knowledge about the relationships between variables, XML was able to generate clinically relevant prediction models that accounted for these relationships. Thus, the examination of ADL prognostic factors using XML is clinically meaningful and has promising implications for real-world clinical applications.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingMachine LearningStrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesExplainable machine learningFunctional Independence MeasureMachine learningPrognosisRehabilitationSHAPStroke

Identifiers

PMID41957775
PMCPMC13214093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.