Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957746›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Hyperkalemia management in heart failure and chronic kidney disease: a Spanish cost-effectiveness analysis of patiromer informed by the integrated DIAMOND trial and real-world evidence.

A Bayes-Genis, J Butler, E Stawowczyk, M Turner, R D Lewis, I T Lloyd, A Ramirez de Arellano

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03888066 (A Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Withdrawal, Parallel Group Study of Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Inhibitor), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03888066 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Withdrawal, Parallel Group Study of Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Inhibitor (RAASi) Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure (DIAMOND)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVifor Pharma, Inc.Ran2019 to 2021Enrolled1,195ConditionsHyperkalemiaArmsPatiromer, Placebos
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A Bayes-GenisHeart Institute, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, CIBERCV, Badalona, Spain.
J ButlerBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
E StawowczykHEOR Ltd, Cardiff, Wales, UK. ewa.stawowczyk@heor.co.uk.
M TurnerHEOR Ltd, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
R D LewisHEOR Ltd, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
I T LloydHEOR Ltd, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
A Ramirez de ArellanoCSL Vifor, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly those treated with renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), hyperkalemia (HK) is common, contributing to negative clinical and economic outcomes. The recent DIAMOND clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03888066) reported that the use of patiromer led to a significant reduction in RAASi discontinuation or dose adjustment, serum potassium levels, and episodes of HK in patients with HF and coexisting CKD. This study analyzed data from the DIAMOND clinical trial and real-world evidence (RWE) to assess the cost-effectiveness of patiromer versus standard of care (SoC) for the treatment of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure and concomitant chronic kidney disease in Spain. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo estimate cost-effectiveness of treating HK with patiromer versus SoC, a published Markov model was adjusted to the Spanish setting. Country-specific inputs were sourced, and health economic outcomes were evaluated.

resultsPatients receiving patiromer were projected to have longer life expectancy than those receiving SoC (10.162 versus 8.110 LYs, respectively). The use of patiromer treatment was estimated to provide an incremental discounted cost of €37,428 and 1.610 incremental QALYs, yielding an ICER of €23,251 per QALY gained. Due to the DIAMOND trial design, a legacy effect of patiromer was present in the SoC arm, causing low serum K+ levels compared with real-world values. To mitigate this, RWE was sought to better represent K+ levels in the SoC arm. Subsequently, a MAIC analysis was used to adjust the K+ levels in the DIAMOND and RWE populations at screening (baseline) and end of the run-in phase (patiromer arm) to improve the data used in the cost-effectiveness model.

conclusionsLong-term data from the DIAMOND trial and RWE demonstrates that patiromer is a cost-effective treatment option for the management of HK in patients with HF and concomitant CKD, compared to SoC in the Spanish healthcare setting. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHyperkalemiaPolymersRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSpainAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorspatiromerPolymersHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)Hyperkalemia (HK)PatiromerRenin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi)

Identifiers

PMID41957746
PMCPMC13192114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.