Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957656›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2026

Network-based disease fingerprinting with neuroinflammation PET imaging.

Leonardo Barzon, Lucia Maccioni, Michelle Carranza Mellana, Julia J Schubert, Ludovica Brusaferri, Oliver Cousins, Ivana Rosenzweig, Yuya Mizuno, Tiago Reis Marques, Neil A Harrison and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Leonardo BarzonDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/B, Padua, 35122, Italy. leonardo.barzon.1@phd.unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4517-221X
Lucia MaccioniDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/B, Padua, 35122, Italy.
Michelle Carranza MellanaParis Brain Institute, ICM, CNRS, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Paris, Sorbonne, France.
Julia J SchubertInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Ludovica BrusaferriDepartments of Radiology and Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Oliver CousinsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Ivana RosenzweigInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Yuya MizunoInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Tiago Reis MarquesPsychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Neil A HarrisonCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Tim FryerDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Edward T BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Valeria MondelliInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Carmine ParianteInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
David SharpDivision of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gregory ScottDivision of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Joana B PereiraDivision of Neuro, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oliver HowesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Vesna SossiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Benedetta BodiniParis Brain Institute, ICM, CNRS, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Paris, Sorbonne, France.
Bruno StankoffParis Brain Institute, ICM, CNRS, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, Paris, Sorbonne, France.
Marco L LoggiaDepartments of Radiology and Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Federico E TurkheimerInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Mattia VeroneseDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/B, Padua, 35122, Italy. mattia.veronese@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-0683

Funding

EU 101028661 and 101026235EU funding within the MUR PNRR "National Center for HPC, BIG DATA AND QUANTUM COMPUTING CN00000013 CN1Fondo per il Programma Nazionale di Ricerca e Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) 2022RXM3H7Margaret Temple, King's Challenge Fund, and Wellcome Trust 094849/Z/10/Z; 227867/Z/23/ZMedical Research Council-UK MC_U120097115; MR/W005557/1 and MR/V013734/1Ministry of University and Research within the Complementary National Plan PNC DIGITAL LIFELONG PREVENTION - DARE PNC0000002_DAREUKRI 10039412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroinflammation is a hallmark of numerous neurodegenerative, psychiatric, and chronic pain disorders and can be assessed in vivo with 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) positron emission tomography (PET). However, conventional quantification methods of TSPO PET are limited and often overlook the spatial relationships between regional signals. The application of network-based approaches to TSPO PET imaging may provide a novel framework to capture disease-specific neuroinflammatory patterns. To address this question, here we developed a data-driven, network-based approach to generate individual brain-wide TSPO PET matrices, employing Euclidean distance to quantify inter-regional pharmacokinetics similarity. We applied this approach to a large multicenter dataset of 528 PET scans utilizing three different TSPO tracers ([11C]-PBR28, [18F]-DPA714, [11C]-PK11195), including healthy controls and patients with different diseases such as multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, depression, and chronic low back pain. Statistical modelling and machine learning classifiers were applied to evaluate the impact of experimental and biological factors on TSPO similarity patterns and to investigate their potential for capturing disease-specific signatures. TSPO similarity patterns demonstrated high biological specificity and reproducibility, with strong test–retest correlations (mean Spearman’s ρ = 0.84). Average precision of disease classification exceeded chance performance by 23–89% across conditions and was driven by condition-specific regional hubs whose topological distributions closely mirrored disease pathophysiology. This specificity was further supported by minimal overlap in feature importance values across conditions. Altogether, our findings show that network-based analysis of human TSPO PET data can detect disease-specific neuroinflammatory signatures. Such methodologies underscore the biological significance of TSPO PET and enhance its translational value, supporting precision medicine strategies for neuroinflammatory disorders.

Indexed as

BrainNeuroinflammatory DiseasesPositron-Emission TomographyHumansRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, GABARadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, GABATSPO protein, humanInter-regional similarityMachine LearningNeuroinflammationPETTSPO

Identifiers

PMID41957656
PMCPMC13214161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.