ArticleBMC medical education2026
If you build it who will come? Widening access through a place-based Rural Training Stream to address local medical workforce shortages.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe establishment of end-to-end rural medical education provides an opportunity to embed place-based strategies to address rural workforce disparities. Deakin University established a Rural (medical) Training Stream (RTS) in 2022, prioritising applicants from the school’s rural footprint in Western Victoria. From 2024, the RTS was extended to a rural end-to-end program (RTS E2E) utilising blended learning to enable students to remain living in their rural communities. This study evaluates the impact of these programs on widening access for under-represented populations and implications for regional workforce development.
methodsCross-sectional admissions data (2020-2025) collected at application to Deakin’s. Doctor of Medicine (MD) course were examined according to five entry cohorts: 2020-21 pre-RTS General, 2022-23 General, 2022-23 RTS, 2024-25 General, 2024-25 RTS E2E. Student demographic variables examined included gender, age, rural background location, residence at course application and undergraduate degree. Descriptive statistics, Fisher’s exact test and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used to analyse cohort differences.
resultsData for 783 students were included in the analysis. Prior to the RTS (2020-21), 5% (n = 12) of MD students were from the rural footprint. This increased to 15% (n = 37) across both cohorts in 2022-23. In 2024-25, 100% of RTS E2E students were from the rural footprint, increasing their proportion in the MD cohort to 28% (n = 77). There were significantly more female students in the RTS E2E (77%) than the RTS (55%) or the General cohorts (range 45–48%). Significantly more students aged over 29 were in the RTS E2E (69%), than the RTS (20%) or General cohorts (range 13–24%). More students entering the RTS E2E had undergraduate health professional degrees (48%) than the RTS (15%) or General cohorts (range 18–25%).
conclusionThe RTS E2E program has successfully widened access for a distinct cohort of students from the rural footprint, predominantly mature-aged, female, health professionals returning to study. With consideration of tailored strategies to support success, there is an opportunity to strengthen students’ existing connections to their rural communities during their rural E2E MD and retain them as medical practitioners for the region, with the depth of understanding of their communities required for locally contextualised, patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.