Trial reportBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Human-animal interactions: starting with pets of children with cerebral palsy.
Trial report in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02897024 (A Comparison), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparison: High Intense Periodic vs. Every Week Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy (ACHIEVE)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman-Animal Interaction and Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI) are those which include an animal for therapy. AAI is used to promote developmental outcomes in children with CP. Here, as a start to understanding the accessibility to pets and aspects of human animal-interactions for children with CP we: (1) describe the number and type of pets; and (2) examine the relationship between the presence of pets, environmental factors, and parent-reported measures.
methods100 children with CP (range 2–8 years) were part of a randomized controlled trial. Data from baseline assessments, before any intervention, were used to describe the prevalence of pets; and associations with presence of pets, environmental descriptive, and parent-reported outcome measures were examined.
results59% of the children had a pet with dogs being most common (76.3%). Children who lived in homes (X2= 10.94) were more likely to have pets compared to those who lived in apartments.
conclusionsPets are common for children with CP. For families of children with CP, it is unknown if there are any disability-related limits to having a pet (e.g. sensory issues, motor limitations, cognitive challenges). Future research could include developing interventions that incorporate pets and assessing the benefits of AAI in children without pets.
trial registrationClincalTrials.gov ID (NCT02897024), Registered September 7, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.