ArticleHuman resources for health2026
Professional support to improve rural medical workforce retention, what works in what context: a realist evaluation.
Article in Human resources for health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProfessional support is an important strategy to improve the retention of rural doctors. However, it is poorly defined and understood within the context of rural medicine making it challenging to design and implement. This research aimed to explore what professional support entails and how it works and in what context, to improve whole of rural medical workforce retention.
methodsAn online expression of interest was circulated to 143 organisations/key informants potentially involved in professional support activities to which 87 replied. Thirty-three of the longest running and comprehensive professional support activities spread across different medical specialties and career stages, locations and target cohorts were selected. Respondents participated in up to two 1-h semi-structured interviews. Realist evaluation involved drawing out patterns about how professional support worked in what context to drive retention of rural doctors, to develop theory. The theory was developed, refined and confirmed with insights from an internal reference and external project advisory group.
resultsA whole of medical workforce conceptualisation of professional support was defined identifying that in the context of rural medicine, three categories of professional support could drive longer term retention of rural doctors in rural work. These were lifelong career support, sustainable practise support and healthcare and social support. Together, these categories are likely to co-stimulate generative mechanisms (rural doctors' sense of comfort, confidence, competence, belonging and bonding) to promote shorter term outcomes of feeling valued and connected on the path to longer term retention. Professional support interventions could be scaled up or down over time and should be responsive to the breadth and complexity of work of rural doctors, their level of isolation/autonomy and their socio-cultural stresses.
conclusionsThe findings articulate the concept of professional support across the rural medical workforce. The results suggest that professional support could be bundled and scaled up or down to address the holistic needs of individual doctors to generate better retention. The theory clarifies a range of professional support activity which could be coordinated through health services, education providers, government and wider agencies to more systematically ensure rural medicine is sustainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.