Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957618›Full record

Observational studyBMC medicine2026

Evaluating DNA methylation markers and extended HPV genotyping in first-void urine for detecting high-grade cervical lesions in HPV-positive women: a cross-sectional study.

Mette Tranberg, Severien Van Keer, Albertus T Hesselink, Pia Nørgaard, Rikke Brøndum, Chunsen Wu, Line Winther Gustafson, Anne Hammer, Pinar Bor, Karen Omann Binderup and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05065853 (Urinary and Vaginal HPV Testing as a Novel Cervical Cancer Screening Tool), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05065853 unknown statusnot on this map

Urinary and Vaginal HPV Testing as a Novel Cervical Cancer Screening Tool: a Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2021 to 2023Enrolled330ConditionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsArmsurine self-sampling group, clinician-collected cervical sample group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mette TranbergDepartment of Public Health Programmes, UNICCA- University Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark. mettrani@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-6694
Severien Van KeerCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Albertus T HesselinkSelf-Screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pia NørgaardDepartment of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark.
Rikke BrøndumDepartment of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark.
Chunsen WuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Southern University of Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Line Winther GustafsonDepartment of Public Health Programmes, UNICCA- University Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark.
Anne HammerDepartment of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark.
Pinar BorDepartment of Public Health Programmes, UNICCA- University Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark.
Karen Omann BinderupDepartment of Public Health Programmes, UNICCA- University Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark.
Christina BlachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark.
Alex VorstersCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Renske SteenbergenDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Danish Cancer Society Research Center R351-A20092Independence Research Fund Denmark 1057-00018b
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst-void urine (FVU) collection for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing may reach un(der)-screened women in cervical cancer screening programs. This cross-sectional study investigated the clinical performance of DNA methylation markers ASCL1 and LHX8 in HPV-positive FVU for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer (CIN2+ and CIN3+). Additionally, results were compared with paired HPV-positive clinician-collected cervical samples (CS) and HPV genotyping.

methodsPaired FVU and CS samples were collected from 286 women aged 23-64 years referred for colposcopy or cervical excision. Histological endpoints included 123 ≤ CIN1 (no dysplasia and CIN1), 38 CIN2, and 123 CIN3/AIS and 2 cancers. Samples were tested for HPV DNA and ASCL1/LHX8 methylation. Methylation test performance was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) and logistic regression. Differences between paired samples and across methylation, HPV16/18, and extended HPV16/18/31/33/52 genotyping in FVU were tested using McNemar's test.

resultsASCL1 and LHX8 methylation levels in HPV-positive FVU increased significantly with disease severity. Methylation testing in FVU yielded an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.82) for CIN3 + and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.79) for CIN2 + , with sensitivities of 79.2% (95% CI: 71.0-85.9%) and 75.5% (95% CI: 68.1-81.9%), respectively, and a specificity of 57.0% (95% CI: 47.8-65.8%) for ≤ CIN1. In CS, methylation testing yielded higher AUCs of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89) for CIN3 + and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85) for CIN2 + , with significantly higher sensitivities (p ≤ 0.02) but lower specificity (p = 0.04) than FVU. In women aged ≥ 30 years, CIN3 + sensitivity and specificity for ≤ CIN1 were similar between FVU and CS (both p = 0.09). No significant differences in accuracy were observed between methylation testing and extended genotyping (p ≥ 0.35) in FVU, while methylation testing showed higher sensitivity (p < 0.01) but lower specificity (p < 0.01) than HPV16/18 genotyping.

conclusionsASCL1/LHX8 methylation testing in HPV-positive FVU showed promise for detecting high-grade cervical disease. Its performance in FVU did not differ significantly from extended HPV genotyping and, in women aged ≥ 30 years, was comparable to performance in CS. This supports methylation testing as a complementary triage test alongside HPV genotyping in urine-based cervical cancer screening, removing the need for follow-up cervical sampling. Further validation in HPV-positive FVU from un(der)-screened populations is warranted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05065853.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationHuman Papillomavirus VirusesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, ViralEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsDNA, ViralCervical cancer screeningDNA methylationEarly detection of cancer/methodsHPV DNA testingUrinary HPV testing

Identifiers

PMID41957618
PMCPMC13182048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.