ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Machine learning prediction of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative pneumonia: a clinical-genomic integrated model.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application value of a multi-omics fusion model based on clinical indicators and genomic features in the prediction of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia, screen key biomarkers influencing resistance, construct and validate an efficient prediction model, and provide a basis for the precise clinical use of antibiotics.
methodsA total of 836 patients diagnosed with Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia and receiving antibiotic treatment in the hospital from January 2023 to June 2025 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a training set (585 cases) and a validation set (251 cases) at a ratio of 7:3. General clinical data, laboratory test indicators, and genomic feature data of the patients were collected. Key predictive indicators were screened through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) prediction models were constructed using Python 3.9.0 software and related libraries. The performance of the models was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The clinical applicability of the models was verified through calibration curves and decision curves to provide a basis for early precise drug use.
resultsMultivariate analysis showed that length of hospital stay, history of β-lactam antibiotic use, β-lactamase gene (blaKPC), deletion of porin protein gene (ompK36), procalcitonin (PCT), sputum culture colony count, and the situation of combined use of antibacterial drugs were independent predictive factors affecting antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia (P < 0.05). Among the constructed models, the XGBoost model had the best performance, with AUC values of 0.853 and 0.814 in the training set and validation set respectively. Its precision, accuracy, recall, F1 score and other indicators were also superior to those of other models.
conclusionA machine-learning model integrating clinical and genomic features can effectively predict antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia. The XGBoost model performs best, which can provide a reference for formulating individualized anti-infection regimens in the early clinical stage, reduce the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, and improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.