ArticleBMC public health2026
The impact of social support on quality of life among older adults in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Dongguan, China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe study examined the impact of social support (SS) on quality of life (QoL) among older adults and whether these impacts varied across different levels of QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA cluster-random-sampling survey was adopted within two towns in Dongguan, China for two months during the epidemic lockdown. Demographic characteristics, SS and QoL were measured. The number of types of services provided by the community, and the frequency and benefits of participation in community activities were used to assess formal social support (FSS), and the Social Support Appraisals (SS-A) scale for informal social support (ISS). The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to measure QoL. Multiple quantile regression adjusting for demographic characteristics variables was employed to explore the impact of SS on QoL among older adults.
resultsOne thousand one hundred thirty older adults (≥ 60 years) were included. The mean age was 78.97 years (± 8.99), over half of (53.45%) received one or two types of community-provided services. 49.29% participated in community activities occasionally. 60.80% perceived these activities as beneficial to their health. In terms of ISS, the mean (SD) scores for social support from family, friends, and others were 23.68 (3.27), 20.14 (2.81), and 15.27 (1.72). The mean PCS-T and MCS-T scores were 50.00 (SD: 6.87) and 50.00 (SD: 9.04), respectively. When controlling for confounders, the results showed that “often” participating in community activities demonstrated a significant positive association with PCS-T, with the associated attenuation at higher quartiles. SS from others exhibited a significant negative correlation only at the lowest quartile of the PCS-T(β= -0.61, p = 0.005). “Always” participating in community activities demonstrated a significant negative association with MCS-T at the highest quantile. SS from family exhibited a significant positive association with MCS-T at both the 5th (β = 0.77, p < 0.001) and 95th (β = 0.8, p < 0.001) quantiles, with SS from others showing a positive association specifically at the highest quantile (β = 0.51, p = 0.022).
conclusionsFormal community-based social support called for greater attention to the needs of older adults with a poorer quality of life, expanding its coverage, and enhancing the effectiveness of their participation in community activities. Fostering a harmonious and caring social and community environment proved to be a pathway to improving the quality of life for older adults during the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.