ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
DNA extracted from boiled archival fish bones yields high-quality whole-genome sequencing data.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Archival samples provide a unique source of organismal DNA, offering the potential to extend the temporal scale of genetic studies by decades to centuries. Fish hard structures, such as otoliths and scales, serve as records for fish collected during fisheries monitoring across a large spatiotemporal scale. Operculum bones are a type of fish hard structure that, although less commonly collected, have been utilised in genetic studies. However, the potential of archived operculum bones to provide high-quality whole-genome sequence information has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we applied a commercially available extraction protocol, with minor adjustments, to isolate genomic DNA from operculum bones of Eurasian perch collected up to 47 years ago, followed by standard next generation short-read whole-genome sequencing. By comparing the metrics of DNA and whole-genome sequencing data of bones with contemporary muscle samples, we demonstrate that the application of a simple extraction protocol on boiled archival fish operculum bones yields high-quality genomic information that is comparable to fresh tissue, highlighting the role of archival operculum bones as an overlooked repository of valuable genomic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.