Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957518›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Acceptability of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: views of the UK public, screened families, health professionals and the SMA community.

Felicity Boardman, Rebecca Howitt, Philip Young, Corinna Clark

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felicity BoardmanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK. Felicity.Boardman@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-6276
Rebecca HowittThe Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5743-0725
Philip YoungSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Corinna ClarkWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-9383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of novel gene therapies, rare genetic diseases once lacking treatments are now being considered for newborn screening programmes (NBS). Wilson and Jungner criteria (drawn on worldwide to guide screening programme evaluation) necessitate effective interventions for a recommendation of screening. Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an example of a condition for which the case for NBS has rapidly gathered pace in recent years. With the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (that are most efficacious when delivered pre-symptomatically), many countries are now piloting or implementing SMA NBS. Despite this, the acceptability of SMA NBS remains underexplored. To address this gap, surveys and interviews were conducted with four key groups: i) general public, ii) SMA families, iii) parents of screened babies iv) healthcare professionals. Survey responses from 9,511 respondents were analysed: 5,604 from the public, 250 from SMA families, 3,541 from parents and 116 from healthcare professionals. Fifty-three qualitative interviews were conducted with 56 participants: 10 public; 12 SMA parents; 9 adults with SMA; 9 parents of screened babies (including one positive result) and 16 healthcare professionals. Support for SMA NBS was found to be consistently high: 90% of public, 99% of SMA parents and adults, 98% of parents of screened babies and 97% of healthcare professionals supported its national implementation. Concerns centred on the impact of diagnoses through NBS, anxiety and treatment ineligabilty for adult-onset SMA. However, these were not considered barriers. SMA NBS is widely acceptable to relevant stakeholder groups, though rapid, comprehensive and high-quality support for families is essential following diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID41957518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.