ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Acceptability of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: views of the UK public, screened families, health professionals and the SMA community.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advent of novel gene therapies, rare genetic diseases once lacking treatments are now being considered for newborn screening programmes (NBS). Wilson and Jungner criteria (drawn on worldwide to guide screening programme evaluation) necessitate effective interventions for a recommendation of screening. Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an example of a condition for which the case for NBS has rapidly gathered pace in recent years. With the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (that are most efficacious when delivered pre-symptomatically), many countries are now piloting or implementing SMA NBS. Despite this, the acceptability of SMA NBS remains underexplored. To address this gap, surveys and interviews were conducted with four key groups: i) general public, ii) SMA families, iii) parents of screened babies iv) healthcare professionals. Survey responses from 9,511 respondents were analysed: 5,604 from the public, 250 from SMA families, 3,541 from parents and 116 from healthcare professionals. Fifty-three qualitative interviews were conducted with 56 participants: 10 public; 12 SMA parents; 9 adults with SMA; 9 parents of screened babies (including one positive result) and 16 healthcare professionals. Support for SMA NBS was found to be consistently high: 90% of public, 99% of SMA parents and adults, 98% of parents of screened babies and 97% of healthcare professionals supported its national implementation. Concerns centred on the impact of diagnoses through NBS, anxiety and treatment ineligabilty for adult-onset SMA. However, these were not considered barriers. SMA NBS is widely acceptable to relevant stakeholder groups, though rapid, comprehensive and high-quality support for families is essential following diagnosis.
Identifiers
41957518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.