ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
How variant discovery redefines genetic prevalence: the case of cystine stone disease.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cystine stones are caused by pathogenic variants in SLC3A1 or SLC7A9. Our prior study revealed a large gap between genetic and clinical prevalence. With increasing discovery of novel variants, we aim to assess how these impact genetic prevalence estimates. Due to the disease rarity, direct patient recruitment and observation is impractical. We applied a population genetics approach to estimate genetic burden and prevalence. Pathogenic variants were identified from the 2022 Human Gene Mutation Database and intersected with population variants from the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3. Allele frequency, carrier rate, and affected rate were calculated. Results were compared to prior data, and simulations were performed across varying initial allele frequencies. We identified 116 and 76 novel pathogenic variants in SLC3A1 and SLC7A9, respectively. Pathogenic allele frequencies increased by +0.12% (SLC3A1) and 0.16% (SLC7A9), leading to fold-changes in genetic prevalence of 1.51x and 2.78x. The combined updated prevalence is 1 in 17,612, a 1.74x increase. Simulations confirmed the fold-change magnitude. In rare diseases, even modest discovery of new variants can significantly increase genetic prevalence. As shown in cystine stone, this helps narrow-but not close-the gap with clinical prevalence. Further efforts are needed to bridge this gap and guide treatment development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.