Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957513›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026

Optimizing cylinder selection in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review.

Yi-Kai Chang, Nicholas Gillman, Eric Chung

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi-Kai ChangUniversity of Queensland, Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nicholas GillmanUniversity of Queensland, Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Eric ChungUniversity of Queensland, Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. ericchg@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-3668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been considerable advances in our scientific knowledge, surgical techniques and technological innovation for modern inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implants over the past 50 years. Four major device companies have successfully manufactured and marketed IPP devices worldwide, and these devices have pre-determined cylinder sizes and unique properties. It is recommended that the cavernosal body be dilated to at least 12 mm to accommodate a standard IPP cylinder and 10 mm for smaller diameter or narrow-base devices. The selection of cylinder size and type is often based on intraoperative total corporal length and dilation measurements; however, other factors such as the surgeon's expertise and preference, the presence of corporal fibrosis and/or the use of a rear-tip extender can influence the final cylinder selection. A properly sized cylinder that sits nicely within the corporal body and cycles well is the prerequisite for an optimal IPP function and a satisfied patient. This article provides a narrative review of the overview of the decision-making and common surgical challenges encountered in the selection of cylinder size and type.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.