ArticleScientific reports2026
Psychometric evaluation of the patient health questionnaire-9 in helping professionals: factor structure, gender invariance, and construct validity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Helping professionals are at elevated risk of depression due to the emotional demands of their work, yet the PHQ-9 has not been psychometrically validated in this population in Central Europe. This study examines the factorial structure, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a sample of 2,893 Slovak helping professionals. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, and bifactor models. All models demonstrated acceptable to excellent fit. The four-factor model provided the most differentiated structure among the correlated models, while the bifactor analysis revealed essential unidimensionality. Measurement invariance across gender was established at configural, metric, scalar, and strict levels for all correlated factor models. Construct validity was supported through significant associations with anxiety, self-criticism, self-reassurance, compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout. The one-factor model consistently showed the strongest or comparable associations with external constructs, with only marginal differences between factors and largely overlapping confidence intervals. These findings establish the PHQ-9 as a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing depression in helping professionals, with the total score suitable for both screening and construct validity assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.