Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957456›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Psychometric evaluation of the patient health questionnaire-9 in helping professionals: factor structure, gender invariance, and construct validity.

Katarína Greškovičová, Katarina Krizova, Bronislava Šoková, Júlia Halamová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katarína GreškovičováInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia. katarina.greskovicova@fses.uniba.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-5660
Katarina KrizovaInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8782-5608
Bronislava ŠokováInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2463-4457
Júlia HalamováInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2327

Funding

Slovak Research and Development Agency PP-COVID-20-0074Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV 1/0054/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helping professionals are at elevated risk of depression due to the emotional demands of their work, yet the PHQ-9 has not been psychometrically validated in this population in Central Europe. This study examines the factorial structure, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a sample of 2,893 Slovak helping professionals. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, and bifactor models. All models demonstrated acceptable to excellent fit. The four-factor model provided the most differentiated structure among the correlated models, while the bifactor analysis revealed essential unidimensionality. Measurement invariance across gender was established at configural, metric, scalar, and strict levels for all correlated factor models. Construct validity was supported through significant associations with anxiety, self-criticism, self-reassurance, compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout. The one-factor model consistently showed the strongest or comparable associations with external constructs, with only marginal differences between factors and largely overlapping confidence intervals. These findings establish the PHQ-9 as a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing depression in helping professionals, with the total score suitable for both screening and construct validity assessment.

Indexed as

DepressionHealth PersonnelPatient Health QuestionnairePsychometricsAdultAnxietyBurnout, ProfessionalFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSlovakiaConstruct validityDepressionFactor structureHelping professionalsMeasurement invariancePHQ-9

Identifiers

PMID41957456
PMCPMC13223282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.