Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957454›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multi-facility virtual diagnostic for longitudinal phase space predictions.

J Lundquist, J Björklund Svensson, P Dijkstal, E Mansten, G Penco, S Werin, F Curbis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J LundquistDepartment of Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. johan.lundquist@maxiv.lu.se.
J Björklund SvenssonDepartment of Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
P DijkstalPSI Center for Accelerator Science and Engineering, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
E ManstenMAX IV Laboratory, Lund, Sweden.
G PencoSincrotrone Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
S WerinDepartment of Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
F CurbisDepartment of Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A thorough understanding of the longitudinal phase space (LPS) of the electron beam is of great advantage to any modern linear accelerator (linac), and of critical importance for operating a free electron laser (FEL). While a transverse deflecting structure (TDS) allows full characterization of a beam's LPS, measurements with a TDS system are often destructive and operationally complex. We present an application of machine learning in the form of a virtual diagnostic (VD) trained on destructive TDS measurements, which allows for online predictions of the beam's LPS based on non-destructive measurements. We show the development and testing of such virtual diagnostics for three different accelerators: the MAX IV linac and the FELs FERMI and SwissFEL. We show how a single, general network architecture and training procedure can be used to reach reliable predictions of the LPS for all three facilities, achieving [Formula: see text] scores reaching 90% or higher across all test datasets. Further, we describe how a simplified architecture can be used for predicting key beam parameters of interest extracted from the full LPS, such as bunch length and slice energy chirp. Our results show how a generalizable VD framework can be rapidly deployed across multiple facilities to enable online monitoring of the beam LPS. For future work, we suggest how virtual diagnostics could be further developed to suit the specific needs of operations at each facility.

Identifiers

PMID41957454
PMCPMC13069019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.