ArticleScientific reports2026
The role of habit strength in the theory of planned behavior for fruit and vegetable intake among women in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption is prevalent among Saudi women, despite global health recommendations. To identify the psychological determinants of F&V intake using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and to examine the moderating role of habit. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 467 adult Saudi women. The questionnaire measured TPB constructs-attitude, subjective norm (SN), perceived behavioral control (PBC), intention, and behavior-alongside habit strength using a validated self-report habit index. Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested the TPB model, and multi-group analysis examined differences across low, medium, and high habit levels. Only 22.3% of women met the WHO recommendation of ≥ 5 F&V servings daily, with significant variation by habit level (10.2% low-habit vs. 30.5% high-habit; p < 0.001). The high habit group showed significantly better knowledge of WHO recommendations (p = 0.013), healthier dietary perceptions (p < 0.001), and more frequent purchasing and preparation of F&V (p < 0.001). Physical activity also increased with habit strength (p < 0.001). Compared to the low-habit group, women in the high-habit group reported higher scores for all the TPB constructs (p < 0.001). SEM results indicated that the TPB model explained 31% of the variance in behavior and 75% in intention. In the overall sample, both intention (β = 0.32, p = 0.005) and PBC (β = 0.26, p = 0.032) predicted F&V intake. PBC was the strongest predictor of intention (β = 0.66, p < 0.001), followed by SN and attitude. Across habit levels, PBC consistently predicted intention; attitude was significant in the low-habit group, and SN in the high-habit group. Perceived control strongly influences both intention and behavior, but habit moderates these relationships. Interventions should enhance self-efficacy and establish regular F&V consumption among Saudi women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.